Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!oberon!cit-vax!elroy!devvax!rich From: rich@devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV (Richard Pettit) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: 386 rumors, questions, and comments Message-ID: <367@devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV> Date: Fri, 11-Sep-87 10:40:50 EDT Article-I.D.: devvax.367 Posted: Fri Sep 11 10:40:50 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 12-Sep-87 17:32:52 EDT References: <1014@vi.ri.cmu.edu> <1197@cartan.Berkeley.EDU> Reply-To: rich@devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV (Richard Pettit) Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA. Lines: 15 Keywords: protection sun machine In article <1197@cartan.Berkeley.EDU> ballou@wheatena.UUCP (Kenneth R. Ballou) writes: >In article <1014@vi.ri.cmu.edu> jfb@vi.ri.cmu.edu (John Brennen) writes: >... >Manual to see that in Virtual 8086 mode, the instructions IN, INS, OUT, >and OUTS are *not* IOPL (I/O Privilege Level) sensitive. So, for example, >a user task could reset the CPU in the same way as one resets the 80286 in >the AT by sending an appropriate command to the 8042. However, those instructions ARE sensitive to the I/O permission bit map. Therefore, if you want to allow your virtual PC to reboot the ENTIRE machine, help yourself. What do you think a V86 monitor is for ? So that you can model the limitations of the virtual PC. rich@devvax.jpl.nasa.gov