Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!nbires!hao!husc6!think!ames!ptsfa!hoptoad!academ!uhnix1!sugar!splut!jay
From: jay@splut.UUCP (Jay Maynard)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Which 80386 system to buy?
Message-ID: <135@splut.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 11-Sep-87 13:04:53 EDT
Article-I.D.: splut.135
Posted: Fri Sep 11 13:04:53 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 13-Sep-87 19:55:17 EDT
References: <133@ncrcpx.UUCP> <256@etn-rad.UUCP> <209@trwrc.UUCP> <297@picuxa.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: Confederate Microsystems, League City, TX
Lines: 21
Keywords: 80386 systems
Summary: Yeah, but...

In article <297@picuxa.UUCP>, gp@picuxa.UUCP (Greg Pasquariello X1190) writes:
> >I'm considering the purchase of an 80386 system to do development
> >..  IBM/PC MSDOS ... XENIX ... Wyse PC's
> 
> Now that it has been officially announced, check out the AT&T 6386
> PC.  Super machine.  Will run DOS and/or UNIX (yes, that's an "and/or".  It
> will run both simultaneously.)  It is a super machine.

Yeah, but how compatible is it?

Considering the list of things that won't work quite right on a 6300, I hope
AT&T (Olivetti?) did a better job of engineering this time around. I've lost
track of the things that wouldn't quite work on AT&Ts.

I thought the 6300+ would run DOS and/or Unix?

-- 
Jay Maynard, K5ZC...>splut!<   | uucp: {hoptoad!academ!uhnix1}!splut!jay
Never call malice that which   | {sun!housun!nuchat,seismo!soma!academ!uhnix1}
can be explained by stupidity. | GEnie: JAYMAYNARD/CI$: 71036,1603/K5ZC@WB5BBW
The opinions herein are shared by neither of my cats, much less anyone else.