Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!oliveb!pyramid!uccba!hal!ncoast!allbery From: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Which 80386 system to buy? Message-ID: <4512@ncoast.UUCP> Date: Sat, 12-Sep-87 16:41:17 EDT Article-I.D.: ncoast.4512 Posted: Sat Sep 12 16:41:17 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 16-Sep-87 01:40:05 EDT References: <133@ncrcpx.UUCP> <256@etn-rad.UUCP> <209@trwrc.UUCP> <297@picuxa.UUCP> Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery) Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc Distribution: na Organization: Cleveland Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, Oh Lines: 22 As quoted from <297@picuxa.UUCP> by gp@picuxa.UUCP (Greg Pasquariello X1190): +--------------- | >I'm considering the purchase of an 80386 system to do development | >There is currently no '386 machine available that is worth | >spending non-company money on. If there was, I'd buy it.) | | Now that it has been officially announced, check out the AT&T 6386 | PC. Super machine. Will run DOS and/or UNIX (yes, that's an "and/or". It | will run both simultaneously.) It is a super machine. +--------------- If you're after a UNIX system (not DOS, at least not yet), take a look at the Altos 386 Series 2000. It's a sweet little hummer... Note that Altos has been building Intel-based UNIX systems for a long time, and they do a good job of making even old 8086s run real multiuser OSes. Who needs OS/2? -- Brandon S. Allbery, moderator of comp.sources.misc {{harvard,mit-eddie}!necntc,well!hoptoad,sun!mandrill!hal}!ncoast!allbery ARPA: necntc!ncoast!allbery@harvard.harvard.edu Fido: 157/502 MCI: BALLBERY <> All opinions in this message are random characters produced when my cat jumped (-: up onto the keyboard of my PC. :-)