Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!mtune!mtunj!howard
From: howard@mtunj.ATT.COM (H. Moskovitz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Which Is Better: DMCS or Concertware+?
Message-ID: <47@mtunj.ATT.COM>
Date: Wed, 26-Aug-87 18:01:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: mtunj.47
Posted: Wed Aug 26 18:01:25 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 29-Aug-87 02:39:24 EDT
References: <37@mtunj.ATT.COM> <1377@killer.UUCP>
Reply-To: howard@mtunj.UUCP (H. Moskovitz)
Organization: The Second Door on the Right
Lines: 22

In article <1377@killer.UUCP> ghoti@killer.UUCP (Alan Perry) writes:
>

>I like best, it is Studio Session by MacNifty.  The instruments are digitized
>so you get the best sound out of any music program I know of for the mac.
>Also, you are allowed 6 (that's right, not just 4) voices with promises of a 
>new release which will support 8 voices.  The way they could do this was simple,
>they just rewrote the sound driver for the Mac.  

I have two questions:

	1) Does it support MIDI (if so, how well)?

	2) How well does it print out scores on the LW? Does it support
	   ADOBE's Sonata font (like DMCS)?


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
		Howard Moskovitz
	AT&T Bell Labs @ Liberty Corner, NJ
		ihnp4!io!howard