Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!dciem!array!len
From: len@array.UUCP (Leonard Vanek)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: "screen" vs. "wm"
Message-ID: <536@array.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 4-Sep-87 09:28:56 EDT
Article-I.D.: array.536
Posted: Fri Sep  4 09:28:56 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 5-Sep-87 15:12:39 EDT
References: <578@augusta.UUCP> <16048@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA> <535@array.UUCP>
Reply-To: len@array.UUCP (Leonard Vanek)
Organization: Array Systems Computing, Toronto, Canada
Lines: 18

In article <535@array.UUCP> len@array.UUCP (Leonard Vanek) writes:
>In article <16048@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA> mkhaw@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA (Mike Khaw) writes:
>>I'd appreciate any comments from anyone who has used both the "screen"
>>program recently posted to comp.sources.whatever and the "wm" program
>>of an earlier vintage, comparing/contrasting the two.
>>
>
>I recommend screen.

I forgot to mention that I am using screen on a Sun 3 system. The
documentation to wm mentions that there are versions of it that use
pipes and run under AT&T systems. Screen only works on BSD systems.

Len


Len Vanek
>