Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!adm!bzs@bu-cs.bu.edu From: bzs@bu-cs.bu.edu Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards Subject: Who owns Unix(tm)? (was: Re: Mach, the new standard?) Message-ID: <9066@brl-adm.ARPA> Date: Sun, 30-Aug-87 17:46:50 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-adm.9066 Posted: Sun Aug 30 17:46:50 1987 Date-Received: Mon, 31-Aug-87 00:00:53 EDT Sender: news@brl-adm.ARPA Lines: 38 It is amusing at best that what is probably a profound legal question on the effects of the break-up (&c.) on ATT's exclusive ownership (likely impossible to describe adequately in less than a few thousand pages of concise legalese) becomes the subject of one-liners mostly reflecting personal moral (with the usual salt-and-peppering of pseudo-logic) and political belief systems. Right now AT&T appears to own "Unix" with everything that implies (the right to license and sell it.) I have no doubt that someone so inclined could manage to challenge this and absolutely no idea what the outcome might be. I don't favor the idea that somehow AT&T is destined to win such suit purely based upon their ability to afford lawyers (Davids have beaten Goliaths and the courts can be one of the more fertile battlegrounds for such endeavors) tho I would expect more potent results if the campaign were backed by a company like DEC or IBM. Then again, they (AT&T) might very well win the suit for the less cynical reason: they're in the right. I honestly don't know but I've yet to see the slightest bit of light shed on the subject in this list and doubt anyone less than seer status is competent to do so. I just really miss the point of public discussion except perhaps to engage in some barroom chatter akin to whether or not Godzilla can beat up King Kong. If anyone knows of any legal cases which might reflect on this matter either past or pending that might be of some peripheral interest, tho perhaps not in u-w. I can see that some would change their priorities in rewriting a free Unix'oid if they could be assured that such a decision will be finalized one way or the other in the near future. Unfortunately, no such certainty appears available. If you're so inclined it's probably easier and more sure and productive to re-write. Support the FSF. -Barry Shein, Boston University