Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!tekecs!doghouse!snoopy
From: snoopy@doghouse.gwd.tek.com (Snoopy)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Symbolic Links
Message-ID: <9091@tekecs.TEK.COM>
Date: Wed, 31-Dec-69 18:59:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekecs.9091
Posted: Wed Dec 31 18:59:59 1969
Date-Received: Sat, 5-Sep-87 23:18:09 EDT
References: <8731@brl-adm.ARPA> <2789@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> <1781@munnari.oz> <2877@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> <8195@mimsy.UUCP> <2886@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Sender: nobody@tekecs.TEK.COM
Reply-To: snoopy@doghouse.gwd.tek.com (Snoopy)
Organization: The Daisy Hill Puppy Farm
Lines: 23
Keywords: Makefile

In article <2886@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> ekrell@hector (Eduardo Krell) writes:
>In article <8195@mimsy.UUCP> chris@mimsy.UUCP writes:

>>	#ifdef KERNEL
>>	#include "../machine/pte.h"
>>	#else
>>	#include <machine/pte.h>
>>	#endif

>The right way of doing this is by issuing the right -I options to cpp.

Why is -I the "right" way and #define the "wrong" way?

What does the relevant section of your Makefile look like? (ho boy,
now I'm asking for it!  Makefile wars!)  People seem to have a hard
enough time writing a reasonable Makefile the way it is.  (Hint:
if the Makefile is larger than the program is, something's wrong!)

Snoopy (wearing my Nomex for this one)
tektronix!doghouse.gwd!snoopy
snoopy@doghouse.gwd.tek.com

"68020s?  I use them as multiply redundant pushpins!"