Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!tekecs!doghouse!snoopy
From: snoopy@doghouse.gwd.tek.com (Snoopy)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Finally Greg and I agree on something. (was: Re: further subdivision
Message-ID: <9143@tekecs.TEK.COM>
Date: Tue, 15-Sep-87 17:31:51 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekecs.9143
Posted: Tue Sep 15 17:31:51 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 18-Sep-87 06:12:02 EDT
References: <887@hao.UCAR.EDU> <360@brandx.rutgers.edu>
Sender: nobody@tekecs.TEK.COM
Reply-To: snoopy@doghouse.gwd.tek.com (Snoopy)
Organization: The Daisy Hill Puppy Farm
Lines: 21
Keywords: wizards and moderation
Xref: mnetor news.groups:1547 comp.unix.wizards:4265

In article <360@brandx.rutgers.edu> webber@brandx.rutgers.edu (Webber) writes:

>I Agree That Net.Wizards Should Be Moderated.  However, it doesn't
>need a moderator.  Instead it should suffice that people can't post to
>net.wizards until they can figure out a way to get around the
>moderation restriction.  Of course, this isn't much of a limit now,
>but Henry Spencer assures me C-news will be more challenging :-)

Grow up, Webber.  Not everyone thinks that playing childish games of
getting around reasonable restrictions is worth their time.
(Unreasonable restrictions are another story, but usenet moderators
tend to be pretty reasonable.)  C-news would probably be out by now if
Henry and Geoff didn't feel the need to increase security against bozos.

Wizards seems to be doing pretty well without moderation, unlike many
groups.  The volume is perhaps higher than convienant, but the S/N
is pretty good.

Snoopy
tektronix!doghouse.gwd!snoopy
snoopy@doghouse.gwd.tek.com