Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!uw-june!uw-entropy!dataio!pilchuck!apcisea!ssc!fyl
From: fyl@ssc.UUCP (Phil Hughes)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,news.admin
Subject: Re: time to make a new newsgroup, filk
Message-ID: <764@ssc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 14-Sep-87 16:18:26 EDT
Article-I.D.: ssc.764
Posted: Mon Sep 14 16:18:26 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 17-Sep-87 06:34:04 EDT
References: <1121@gilsys.UUCP> <7283@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP>
Organization: SSC, Inc., Seattle, WA
Lines: 15
Summary: Can't we have a new uport group and not argue?
Xref: mnetor comp.unix.xenix:747 news.admin:1003


I have an interest in both XENIX and Microport systems as we sell
software and documentation for both but I still believe they should
be two groups.  For those who want to talk about IBM PCs (running anything)
there is a group.  For those who want to talk about architecture there
is a group.  I could go on.

One of our consultants specializes in Microport.  He uses a shell script
to grep all the news for Microport stuff as he has no interest in Xenix.
I would probably elect to read both groups but I am busy and would like
that choice.
-- 
Phil Hughes, SSC, Inc. P.O. Box 55549,       
Seattle, WA 98155  (206)FOR-UNIX            
    ...!uw-beaver!tikal!ssc!fyl