Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!sri-unix!rutgers!ames!lll-tis!ptsfa!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!bsu-cs!dhesi From: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Censorship (was Re: I ain't afraid of no Batwoman) Message-ID: <1064@bsu-cs.UUCP> Date: Sat, 29-Aug-87 12:50:40 EDT Article-I.D.: bsu-cs.1064 Posted: Sat Aug 29 12:50:40 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 30-Aug-87 09:18:41 EDT Reply-To: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) Organization: CS Dept, Ball St U, Muncie, Indiana Lines: 31 Summary: Clarifying what censorship is Re: Recent discussion of censorship. Censorship is done by government. Magazine and newspaper editors routinely decide what will and will not be published. This is not censorship. Censorship occurs when one is prevented from exercising one's legal right to use a medium of expression. When a magazine editor deletes a paragraph from an article, that is not censorship. It's editing. It doesn't matter why the editor chose to delete it. When a government agency forces that magazine editor to delete a paragraph, that's censorship. It doesn't matter why the government agency chose to require that paragraph to be deleted. Usenet is owned and operated by a collection of independent sites. Each site is free to transmit or not transmit anything it receives. If a site chooses not to transmit specific newsgroups, or articles about specific subjects, or articles posted by specific individuals, it is emphatically not censorship. It's simply selective retransmission. It doesn't matter on what basis the site makes the selection. The ice gets a bit thin if a site that selectively deletes articles is funded by government. Then, if the deletion occurred because of political content, you might be justified in calling it censorship. But even government agencies have a mandate to use their funds in a responsible manner, so you would still have to show that some irresponsible use of funds occurred. -- Rahul Dhesi UUCP: {ihnp4,seismo}!{iuvax,pur-ee}!bsu-cs!dhesi