Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!epiwrl!epimass!jbuck From: jbuck@epimass.EPI.COM (Joe Buck) Newsgroups: news.software.b Subject: Re: Minor hacks to rn - anyone want 'em? Message-ID: <1496@epimass.EPI.COM> Date: Tue, 15-Sep-87 12:51:16 EDT Article-I.D.: epimass.1496 Posted: Tue Sep 15 12:51:16 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 17-Sep-87 04:45:43 EDT References: <936@umix.cc.umich.edu> Reply-To: jbuck@epimass.EPI.COM (Joe Buck) Organization: Entropic Processing, Inc., Cupertino, CA Lines: 24 Summary: please try to get them into an official patch In article <936@umix.cc.umich.edu> hyc@umix.cc.umich.edu (Howard Chu) writes: >I've done a bit of hacking on the Configure script and the associated code >to munge the article headers a bit more on what rn posts... >If there's sufficient interest (mail me for requests) should I post it >here, or elsewhere, or ... ? The best thing about rn is its centralized maintenance; Larry did the net a great favor in showing how this can be done. A patch to fill in the correct domain is vitally needed. For example, postings from panda.stanford.edu contain Reply-To: user@panda.UUCP -- a completely different machine. Your UUCP-Path header idea is more questionable though. It's not standard and there's no official specification for its syntax. You shouldn't be inventing one without considering all the issues. Larry, are you out there? Have you done anything about the domain problem? -- - Joe Buck jbuck@epimass.epi.com {uunet,ucbvax,sun,decwrl,}!epimass.epi.com!jbuck Old arpa mailers: jbuck%epimass.epi.com@uunet.uu.net