Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!mimsy!oddjob!hao!boulder!sunybcs!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!jade!violet.berkeley.edu!ed298-ak
From: ed298-ak@violet.berkeley.edu (Edouard Lagache)
Newsgroups: comp.ai,sci.philosophy.tech,talk.philosophy.misc
Subject: Re: Is Computer Science Science?
Message-ID: <5068@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Fri, 11-Sep-87 01:00:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: jade.5068
Posted: Fri Sep 11 01:00:28 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 12-Sep-87 15:41:13 EDT
References: <5113@sunybcs.UUCP> <6195@apple.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: ed298-ak@violet.berkeley.edu (Edouard Lagache)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 14
Xref: mnetor comp.ai:758 sci.philosophy.tech:470 talk.philosophy.misc:704

In article <6195@apple.UUCP> corwin@apple.UUCP (Entomology Lab) writes:
>In article <5113@sunybcs.UUCP> rapaport@sunybcs.UUCP (William J. Rapaport) writes:
>>
.... Does Computer Science have any laws?
>>
>"Anything that can go wrong will go wrong."
>"There is always one more bug"
>"The differnce between a bug and a feature is that a feature is documented"
>-cory

	Hey those aren't laws from Computer Science, they are from the 
	Science (Religion?) of Murphyology!

								E.L.