Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!boulder!sunybcs!rutgers!labrea!decwrl!pyramid!weitek!mahar From: mahar@weitek.UUCP (Mike Mahar) Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,sci.space Subject: Re: Things aint so bad Message-ID: <376@attila.weitek.UUCP> Date: Wed, 16-Sep-87 13:58:49 EDT Article-I.D.: attila.376 Posted: Wed Sep 16 13:58:49 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 19-Sep-87 02:32:54 EDT References: <13312@amdahl.amdahl.com> <7973@think.UUCP> <8561@utzoo.UUCP> <474@eplrx7.UUCP> <632@its63b.ed.ac.uk> Reply-To: mahar@attila.UUCP (Mike Mahar) Organization: WEITEK Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA Lines: 29 Summary: What we got, vs What they got Xref: mnetor sci.space.shuttle:322 sci.space:2913 There has been a lot of discussion lately on the wonderful Soviet space program verses our nonexistant space program. When we have a failure, we put our whole program on hold for 2 years. When they have a failure, they sweep up the mess and get back to business. Sometimes, in a matter of days. Why is this? Americans don't seem willing to accept the risks of spaceflight. We want space travel to be as safe as a bus ride downtown. The Soviets have accepted the risk and are willing to live with it. When the Shuttle blew up, it was only a matter of hours until the specific cause was known. NASA could have changed the launch criteria to require warmer weather and continued launching in a few weeks. This, they did not do and I don't think they should have either. We can't tell what the Soviet would have done in a similar situation. We have three shuttles now. We could use them if we had to. I don't think the Soviet hardware is any better than ours. It is not much worse either. The Soviets have a space station and we don't. Many people in our space science community think we don't need one. I have a question. How does the Mir compare with Skylab, besides the obvious fact that we no longer have Skylab. -- Mike Mahar UUCP: {turtlevax, cae780}!weitek!mahar Disclaimer: The above opinions are, in fact, not opinions. They are facts.