Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!hoptoad!amdcad!decwrl!ucbvax!rutgers!ukma!ukecc!vnend From: vnend@ukecc.UUCP Newsgroups: alt.cyberpunk Subject: Re: The CyberTest Message-ID: <1639@ukecc.engr.uky.edu> Date: Wed, 7-Oct-87 21:10:38 EDT Article-I.D.: ukecc.1639 Posted: Wed Oct 7 21:10:38 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 11-Oct-87 08:28:59 EDT References: <6413@apple.UUCP> Reply-To: vnend@engr.uky.edu (D. V. W. James) Followup-To: alt.cyberpunk Distribution: world Organization: Univ. of KY Engineering Computing Center Lines: 28 In article <6413@apple.UUCP> grady@apple.UUCP (Grady Ward) writes: > O.K. So the Turing test can tell you when AI's are >indistinguishable from humans. But what we'll need in the 90's is a >way to tell when AI's are uncontrovertedly superior to humans -- >this test, I propose to call the CyberTest. > The criterion the CyberTest uses is simple: when an AI is so >persuasive, intuitive, and eloquent that EVERY person is convinced of >its superiority, then, in fact, it will be. This is a good test because the >sufficiency of it cannot be questioned. (Since everyone is convinced, >no one would think to ask the question.) >-- Grady Ward But all (ha!) that this requires is an expert system for convincing humans, a talking head that scores high on retoric. The only area that it would really be superior in would be convincing people (not easy, but...) I'm afraid that the Cybertest is going to require a little more than this, as some of us will require more than persuation, intuition and eloquence to say that someon or thing is superior. It's gonna take *proof*! Nice idea though. How would you have it go about proving its superiority as opposed to just talking about it? -- Later y'all, Vnend Ignorance is the Mother of Adventure. cbosgd!ukma!ukecc!vnend; vnend@engr.uky.edu; vnend%ukecc.uucp@ukma.BITNET Also: cn0001dj@ukcc.BITNET, Compuserve 73277,1513 and VNEND on GEnie I may be smart, but I can lift heavy things.