Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!hoptoad!ptsfa!pyramid!decwrl!labrea!jade!ucbvax!BOSCO.BERKELEY.EDU!gsmith
From: gsmith@BOSCO.BERKELEY.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Rhonda, Professional Adult
Message-ID: <8709212141.AA01408@ronzoni>
Date: Mon, 21-Sep-87 17:41:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: ronzoni.8709212141.AA01408
Posted: Mon Sep 21 17:41:34 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 23-Sep-87 05:45:08 EDT
References: <8709070142.AA00636@ragu> <20534@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: ronzoni!gsmith (Gene Ward Smith)
Organization: Bosco Gang Chocolate Center
Lines: 44

In article <20869@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> jwl@ernie.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (James Wilbur Lewis) writes:
>In article <8709200017.AA01337@ragu> ragu!gsmith (Gene Ward Smith) writes:
>-In article <20867@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> jwl@ernie.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (James Wilbur Lewis) writes:

>Well, Rhonda made a very reasonable request that you post some of those
>terrible, nasty, threatening letters that pesky ol' Timmy has been writing
>so that we can judge your accusations and complaints for ourselves.

  I now have permission to do so, expect same next weekend.


>->I've seen enough spiteful speculation emanating
>->from the Brahms Gang (yes, with YOUR name attached...like that
>->'Tim Maroney quiz')  to know that this is a clear case of the pot
>->calling the kettle black.

>-  Since that quiz was posted *after* Maroney began his attempt to nuke
>-my account and not by me (appearences can be deceiving with the Gang)
>-I am not impressed. 

>Are you denying complicity in that incident?  Did I hallucinate your
>.signature on it, even though it was posted from Matt's account, which
>indicates that it was put there intentionally?

  I worked on some of the questions (once again, this was AFTER
AFTER AFTER Maroney draged me into it, you turkeys!) and Matthew
co-signed my name and sort of asked persmission afterwards, which
was retroactivly granted.

>At any rate, Rhonda tells me that members of the Brahms Gang have
>been harassing HER through email!  So how is her "spiteful speculation"
>any different from your public rantings about Tim?  

  I don't know about "memebers of the Brhams Gang". I sent her
ONE ONE ONE ONE (1 as in the number ONE) *short* letter, in
respose to a boast everyone agreed with her. Pfui. This is silly.

>Somehow I expected something more clever than "B..b..but HE started it!!"
>from the Brahms Gang.  Shit, this is like shooting fish in a barrel!
>No less fun, though....the greatest joy in net.flaming, as Hunter S.
>Thompson observed in politics, is "a wide-open hammer shot on some
>poor bastard who knows he's trapped, but can't flee."
 
  I stick to the truth, which I guess doesn't help.