Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!hoptoad!ptsfa!pyramid!decwrl!labrea!jade!ucbvax!BOSCO.BERKELEY.EDU!gsmith
From: gsmith@BOSCO.BERKELEY.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Rhonda, Professional Adult
Message-ID: <8709212200.AA01432@ronzoni>
Date: Mon, 21-Sep-87 18:00:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: ronzoni.8709212200.AA01432
Posted: Mon Sep 21 18:00:41 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 23-Sep-87 05:45:52 EDT
References: <8709070142.AA00636@ragu> <20534@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: ronzoni!gsmith (Gene Ward Smith)
Organization: Bosco Gang Chocolate Center
Lines: 60

In article <2997@hoptoad.uucp> tim@hoptoad.UUCP (Tim Maroney) writes:
>In article <8709190857.AA00315@chex> chex!gsmith (Gene Ward Smith) writes:

>>  As I understand it, it is a violation of netiquette to publish
>>e-mail to the net without permission.

>This is the first time Gene has ever taken standards of politeness into
>account, which should raise some suspicions.

  It rasies a suspicion you don't know me. I haven't been sending
you or anyone tons of abusivie mail, as Rhonda clamied, nor was I
in your war with Matthew over the lustful aardvark or whatever it
was about until YOU dragged me in.  I also very seldom use the
"seven naughty words", nor do I flame people who aren't flaming
others first. These are low stadards, perhaps, but they're as
good as Rhondas and infintely better than yours. How DARE you!


>Rightly so: there are no
>fabrications in my messages, and it would hardly serve Gene's vendetta to
>make that known. 


  I gotta go teach calculus in San Jose real soon. I'll be back and
show just why I said you were telling lies, or perhaps paranoid
delusions.

 He has attempted to discredit my true statement, that he
>and Wiener between them posted anti-Maroney messages with roughly daily
>frequency, by misconstruing it to say I claimed that Gene personally wrote
>daily messages.

I wasn't even a part of it in the first place, you self-serving jerk,
until YOU dragged me into it. Why did you? And I published or
copublished three flames IN TOTAL that I recall, before the start
of this post-Wiener "war".

  This is just one in a long sequence of self-serving
>untruths, of which the most extreme was claiming that my complaints were
>based on the epithet "Captain Carnage".

  Matthew claimed this is what upset you the most, and since I wasn't
even paying attention at first, how do I know differently? I don't 
even know what got you going, nor why you decided to include me
in.

>My greatest thanks, without
>denigrating anyone's contribution, go to Rhonda.

  Rhonda doesn't know anything. Laura does, and I don't see she
has taken your side, particularly. Just what has anyone said who
KNOWS anything (this does not include Rhonda or James) which
supports you more than me? In particular, who other than you
claims I was abusing you constantly, or was a part of a
conspiricy, illegal or otherwise?


ucbvax!brahms!gsmith    Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720
"Last week in a dream I gave a fellow my shirt buttons to differentiate
and the fellow ran away with them." -- Engels