Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!dciem!nrcaer!cognos!geovision!alastair
From: alastair@geovision.UUCP (Alastair Mayer)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Let's get a real flame war going.
Message-ID: <177@geovision.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 22-Sep-87 12:01:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: geovisio.177
Posted: Tue Sep 22 12:01:40 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 25-Sep-87 03:46:51 EDT
References: <5569@ihlpa.ATT.COM>
Reply-To: alastair@geovision.UUCP (Alastair Mayer)
Organization: Geovision Corporation, Ottawa, Canada
Lines: 36
Summary: Has it started yet?

In article <5569@ihlpa.ATT.COM> rs1@ihlpa.UUCP writes:
> ...
>To anyone easily offended, I say one thing, " GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!!"
>
>You have been warned.  To those who know me.  I will use alt.flame for one
>purpose: to cause controversy and get people P.O.'d.  In this news group
>just because I say it, doesn't mean, I believe it. OK?

	There he goes, wimping out ahead of time....

>Let the flames begin!!!!!!!!!!!!!
   
   Okay, you asked...
>
> [.. some mildly derogatory comments about women, tech news groups,
    and rec.humor, not worth repeating.  I've seen worse in the
    newspaper comic pages, but then, that's probably an order of magnitude
    to intellectual for Roger..]

>Now that is what alt.flame is all about!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
  Hardly, you imbecilic malodorous little pervert.  If you want *flames*,
you've got to do more than toss out some random comments that are barely
worth reading, let alone going to the effort of flaming.  It's submoronic
recto-cranial inverts like you that give civilized newsgroups like
alt.flames a bad name.  Why don't you go back to net.cretins where you
slithered out from?

>Roger Sersted

 (Feel better now?)
-- 
 Alastair JW Mayer     BIX: al
                      UUCP: ...!utzoo!dciem!nrcaer!cognos!geovision!alastair

 "What we really need is a good 5-cent/gram launch vehicle."