Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!hoptoad!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!rutgers!mit-eddie!oaf From: oaf@mit-eddie.UUCP Newsgroups: alt.flame Subject: pit up or shit up Message-ID: <7133@eddie.MIT.EDU> Date: Sat, 10-Oct-87 20:20:59 EDT Article-I.D.: eddie.7133 Posted: Sat Oct 10 20:20:59 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 13-Oct-87 01:08:39 EDT Reply-To: oaf@eddie.MIT.EDU (you oafish oaf) Organization: MIT communal cemetery Lines: 32 Summary: insults all around, on the issues of the day LETTERS/NETIQUETTE/BARF Who the shvg cares what netiquette is when there's a substantive issue to be hassled out? If GWS claims TM offed MW's account by writ- ing nasty letters to GWS(????), let's see 'em. Proprietary rights are waived when the letters are referred to as evidence. The _best_ evi- dence be the letters they very selfs, so if that's what you're going to "use," do it right, not wimpteously. If anyone feels queasy about retransmitting private mail, note that it's _your_ property, once sent to you. You can do whatever you want with it. The only exception is if you've signed a legally binding non-disclosure agreement. The same applies to conversations, and even details of a sexual encounter. (Me learn about that when a woman publicized my sexual shortcomings, and others wondered whether I was prepared to sue. I was not.) TOUGH GUY This guy rs1 who wants to make fur fly. Hey, /rs1@ihlpa/h:j Nooo problem... ELLEN EADES Barf on people who object to someone "ogling." Reminds me of high school, when kids would come up and say "What're YOU looking at," then haul off and belt me. Ellen, if you're gonna be a belligerent drunk, please stick to the mean streets you seem to love so well. That doesn't extend to comments or touches. But if you object to passive reception, wear a nonfucking chador. Thank you veddy veddy much. -- Oded A. Feingold 36 Columbia Rd., Medford, Mass. 02155 {allegra|ihnp4!mit-eddie}!mit-vax!oaf OAF@OZ.AI.MIT.EDU 617-395-8895