Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!hoptoad!well!booter
From: booter@well.UUCP
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why are those (*#$(#$& bastards doing it during RUSH HOUR???
Message-ID: <3981@well.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 19-Sep-87 03:00:29 EDT
Article-I.D.: well.3981
Posted: Sat Sep 19 03:00:29 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 20-Sep-87 07:51:41 EDT
References: <3951@well.UUCP> <5187@oliveb.UUCP>
Reply-To: booter@well.UUCP (Elaine Richards)
Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link, Sausalito, CA
Lines: 33
Keywords: pope, geary, MUNI, 5pm

In article <5187@oliveb.UUCP> enchant@oliveb.UUCP (Dan Crocker) writes:
>In article <3951@well.UUCP>, bandy@well.UUCP (Andrew Scott Beals) writes:
>{Andy flames the Pope}
>> Andrew Scott Beals
>
>What an incredibly useless discourse!!  You might consider calming down

You have described 90% of netnews.

>next time you want to voice your opinion.  Of course, if you were calm
>when you wrote it, you might consider keeping your mouth shut.  Everybody

Well, that's no fun!

>has their right to express himself, but when it doesn't lead to 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ CORRECT
>constructive discussions, why bother?  Next time, it would be considerate

Do you know what a flame is? Do you know that this is the flame news
group? There is no such thing as a constructive discussion in a flame
newsgroup!! If you want constructive, read net.pets or something.

>of you to "rot-13" your posting and place a warning saying: "offensive to 
>anyone with intelligence."  That way, only the stupid people have themselves

(BELCH)

>to blame if they are offended.  Of course, judging from your posting, I 
>suspect consideration is too much to ask.

You dummy, this is FLAMAGE here, not Miss Manners' parlor.