Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!hoptoad!ptsfa!pyramid!decwrl!ucbvax!rutgers!rochester!bbn!oberon!skat.usc.edu!seidel
From: seidel@skat.usc.edu.UUCP
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why are Larger women put down so much?
Message-ID: <4457@oberon.USC.EDU>
Date: Fri, 18-Sep-87 12:34:21 EDT
Article-I.D.: oberon.4457
Posted: Fri Sep 18 12:34:21 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 20-Sep-87 17:35:31 EDT
References: <10439@labrea.STANFORD.EDU> <14498@amdahl.amdahl.com>
Sender: nobody@oberon.USC.EDU
Reply-To: seidel@skat.usc.edu (Starman)
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 50
Keywords: Heavy, Rubenesque, Lots of Curves

In article <14498@amdahl.amdahl.com> eh@amdahl.amdahl.com (Elliot Howard) writes:
>In article <10439@labrea.STANFORD.EDU> bjork@labrea.STANFORD.EDU (Steve Bjork) writes:
<>I guess my idea of what a female should be is *radically* different
<>than the one advertised on television and in those "before and
<>after" ads for health clubs and such.
<>
<>To be honest, I would prefer the woman in the "before" condition.
<>
<>--Steve
>
>Great! Fantastic! I wish more men were like you, or better yet more men
>were gay, since that leaves more of them skinny little wenches for me!
>(Incidentally, I've tried both; thin women are a lot more fun in bed.
>We won't go into the mechanical reasons for this; I think it's obvious.
>And my 90 pound girlfriend is a lot more comfortable lying on top of me
>than my 200 pound girlfriend was.)
>
>As for complaining about "wanting to lose 5 more pounds," I agree, that
>is damn silly. I can put on more than that it one meal.
>
>Now flame me please for being a male chauvinist!

OK, if you insist!!!  (you male chauvinist!)

But, just to be fair, I warn you to put on your asbestos suit now.


                  ~   ~    ~  ~
             /---// //~~//~~-~  ~  ~
_______     /~/-_~//~=//-=//--~~ ~
|ACMEtm\_ ///=~//--/-/-/-=~~~--=~~ ~ ~        FFFFOOOOOOOOOOMMMM!!!!!
|FLAMER _|<<==/==\-~~~--~<~~<~~<-~~   ~       -----------------------
|______/  \\\~~\\--\\~\\--\\--\~ ~ ~
            \--\\~~\-~--~=\\-~~  ~
             \~~~\\~\-~\~~\~~  ~
                ~    ~    ~ ~


Pretty impressive, eh?



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
From the terminal of           |               | "69 is an awkward number."    
                            " -S-T A R M A N " |         - Professor Barry,
seidel@skat.USC.EDU            |               |  explaining the reason for 70
seidel@uscvm.BITNET                            |  nautical miles to a degree. 
                                               |  
Michael Seidel                                 |  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -