Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!amdcad!ames!sdcsvax!ucbvax!SHASTA.STANFORD.EDU!kaufman
From: kaufman@SHASTA.STANFORD.EDU (Marc Kaufman)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: New Service in BetaTest at NJ Bell
Message-ID: <2075@Shasta.STANFORD.EDU>
Date: Wed, 7-Oct-87 20:53:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: Shasta.2075
Posted: Wed Oct  7 20:53:06 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 11-Oct-87 04:22:31 EDT
References: <1692@aramis.rutgers.edu> <2149@ihuxv.ATT.COM>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: kaufman@Shasta.stanford.edu (Marc Kaufman)
Organization: Stanford University
Lines: 16
Approved: telecom@xx.lcs.mit.edu


In article <2149@ihuxv.ATT.COM> moss!ihuxv!tedk@RUTGERS.EDU (55624-Kekatos,T.G.) writes:

.>begin betatesting around November.  The question of the day: Is it
.>legal?  What if you have an unlisted number and do not want it
.>revealed?  Has Ma Belle Broken a contract she made with you?

(re: ISDN)...
>Yes, all the legal queations have been answered. There
>is a option where the caller can withhold the display of
>their directory number

However.. the current specification for ISDN 911 calls provides that
the call will NOT go through if the caller withholds the number!

Marc Kaufman (kaufman@Shasta.stanford.edu)