Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!super.upenn.edu!eecae!nancy!umix!honey
From: honey@umix.cc.umich.edu (Peter Honeyman)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Info on IDA Sendmail kit / pathalias
Message-ID: <1692@umix.cc.umich.edu>
Date: Sat, 26-Sep-87 23:47:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: umix.1692
Posted: Sat Sep 26 23:47:05 1987
Date-Received: Mon, 28-Sep-87 04:02:52 EDT
References: <20962@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: honey@citi.umich.edu (Peter Honeyman)
Organization: Center for Information Technology Integration, Univ of Michigan
Lines: 13

yeah, that's a small problem with sendmail: as delivered, it doesn't
allow you to run arbitrary programs/scripts on addresses.  frankly,
many people find it a lot easier to munge headers in c or sh than in
sendmail's rule language, possibly the most brain-damaged language ever
invented, yes, rob, even worse than postscript.

i suppose it's possible to make the local mailer a router that looks at
the address and passes the message back to sendmail ... maybe not.

i've seen sendmail hacks (from waterloo?) that let rewrite rules munge
addresses with $>program.

	peter