Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!rochester!udel!mmdf
From: LISTSERV%FINHUTC.BITNET@wiscvm.wisc.edu (1.5l)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: File: "MINIX-L MAIL" being sent to you
Message-ID: <551@louie.udel.EDU>
Date: Thu, 1-Oct-87 17:52:42 EDT
Article-I.D.: louie.551
Posted: Thu Oct  1 17:52:42 1987
Date-Received: Mon, 5-Oct-87 07:35:46 EDT
Sender: mmdf@udel.EDU
Lines: 26

Received: from NDSUVM1(MAILER) by FINHUTC (Mailer X1.25) id 2676;
          Thu, 01 Oct 87 23:44:31 FIN
Received: by NDSUVM1 (Mailer X1.24) id 4728; Thu, 01 Oct 87 16:39:21 CDT
Received: from UDEL.EDU by WISCVM.WISC.EDU ; Thu, 01 Oct 87 16:37:09 CDT
Received: from Louie.UDEL.EDU by Louie.UDEL.EDU id aa26298; 1 Oct 87 16:20 EDT
Received: from USENET by Louie.UDEL.EDU id aa26097; 1 Oct 87 16:09 EDT
Keywords: irrelevance, wasted bandwidth
ARPA: usenet@udel.EDU,  UUCP: ...{harv <usenet@UDEL.EDU>
Source-Info:  From (or Sender) name not authenticated.
Message-ID: <1436@ogcvax.UUCP>
Newsgroups:   comp.os.minix
Date:         29 Sep 87 19:35:00 GMT
Reply-To:     INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU
Sender:       Minix operating system <MINIX-L@NDSUVM1>
From:         Phil Miller <pcm@ogcvax.uucp>
Subject:      Re: VM on PDP-11
X-LSVRepTo:
X-LSVopts: NOACK Org=MINIX-L@NDSUVM1
X-LSVvia:  MINIX-L@NDSUVM1
X-LSVTo: info-minix@UDEL.EDU
To: $PEER$ <MINIX-L@FINHUTC>

When I went to read my comp.os.minix articles today, 4 of the 7 articles
were about virtual memory on the PDP-11.  MUST this vacuous debate continue
within comp.os.minix?  Flames to me directly, please -- enough comp.os.minix
space has already been wasted on this topic.