Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!oddjob!matt
From: matt@oddjob.UChicago.EDU (Ke Kupua)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards,comp.os.misc
Subject: Re: Big Programs Hurt Performance
Message-ID: <14000@oddjob.UChicago.EDU>
Date: Wed, 23-Sep-87 14:36:56 EDT
Article-I.D.: oddjob.14000
Posted: Wed Sep 23 14:36:56 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 26-Sep-87 03:50:44 EDT
References: <1665@ncr-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM) <8579@utzoo.UUCP) <6886@eddie.MIT.EDU) <1387@osiris.UUCP> <382@pcrat.UUCP>
Organization: Audible Boy Birdwatcher Society
Lines: 14
Xref: mnetor comp.unix.wizards:4434 comp.os.misc:221

In article <382@pcrat.UUCP> rick@pcrat.UUCP (Rick Richardson) writes:

) The half serious thoughts around here: port down the VAX's native C
) compiler to a <hot micro>.

This is not the first time I've seen the phrase "VAX's native C
compiler" used here.  What would you mean by a vax C compiler that
was not "native"?

I would assume that this person meant "VMS C compiler" and was
suffering from the "VAX == VMS" delusion, but in unix-wizards???
________________________________________________________
Matt	     University		matt@oddjob.uchicago.edu
Crawford     of Chicago     {astrovax,ihnp4}!oddjob!matt