Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!hplabs!ucbvax!TCGOULD.TN.CORNELL.EDU!tedcrane
From: tedcrane@TCGOULD.TN.CORNELL.EDU (Ted Crane)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: TCP/IP and DECnet
Message-ID: <8710081827.AA13899@tcgould.TN.CORNELL.EDU>
Date: Thu, 8-Oct-87 14:27:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: tcgould.8710081827.AA13899
Posted: Thu Oct  8 14:27:14 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 11-Oct-87 11:47:07 EDT
References: <159@medivax.UUCP>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: tedcrane@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu (Ted Crane)
Organization: Tompkins County Computing, Ithaca, NY
Lines: 16
Keywords: NET

In article <159@medivax.UUCP> chinson@medivax.UUCP (Chinson Yi) writes:
>we have some DECserver 100 accessing it.  We are trying to
>install a TCP/IP product on it to communicate with our Ultrix
>machine and I am wondering if the DECnet and TCP/IP will coexist
>on the same machine sharing a DEQNA.  We will be getting 

There've been a few replies to this.  One mentioned putting DECnet up on
the Ultrix machine.  This is, in some ways, a limited solution but, *for
what it does*, it works very well.  Of course, it isn't free...

-ted
-- 
- ted crane, alias (tc)
tedcrane@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu                       BITNET: tedcrane@CRNLTHRY
{decvax!ucbvax}!tcgould.tn.cornell.edu!tedcrane             DECnet: GOPHER::THC
                                                                 (607) 273-8768