Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!psuvax1!jte
From: jte@psuvax1.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.sources.wanted,comp.unix.questions
Subject: Smail or Elm??
Message-ID: <2908@psuvax1.psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 7-Sep-87 00:35:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: psuvax1.2908
Posted: Mon Sep  7 00:35:15 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 8-Sep-87 01:03:17 EDT
References: <1392@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <890@bakerst.UUCP> <212@ho7cad.ATT.COM>
Reply-To: jte@psuvax1.psu.edu (Jon Eckhardt)
Distribution: world
Organization: Penn State University, University Park, PA
Lines: 11
Xref: utgpu comp.mail.misc:440 comp.sources.wanted:1867 comp.unix.questions:3525

Is it a good idea to run ELM on a 3B2/300?  I was going to pick between
smail or ELM and had settled on SMAIL because it looks very simple but
now I hear that ELM has a smart user-interface.  Which should I choose?
All I need is a mailer that will be able to forward mail messages to 
a smarthost if it can't figure out what to do with it.  Thanks for any info.

--Jon

# jte@psuvax1.psu.edu (128.118.6.2)  <- ARPA    Phone: 814-237-1901 (Home)   #
# jte@psuvax1                        <- BITNET  Phone: 814-865-9723 (Work)   # 
# <ihnp4,burdvax,purdue>!psuvax1!jte <- UUCP    BBS: 814-865-9550 (300/1200) #