Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!boulder!sunybcs!bingvaxu!leah!uwmcsd1!marque!ddsw1!gryphon!richard From: richard@gryphon.CTS.COM (Richard Sexton) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Technical excellence in publishing (or a lack thereof) Message-ID: <1601@gryphon.CTS.COM> Date: Sat, 19-Sep-87 01:51:12 EDT Article-I.D.: gryphon.1601 Posted: Sat Sep 19 01:51:12 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 20-Sep-87 12:29:25 EDT References: Reply-To: richard@gryphon.CTS.COM (Richard Sexton) Followup-To: comp.sys.misc || talk.bizarre || alt.flme Organization: Trailing Edge Technology, Redondo Beach, CA Lines: 34 Keywords: publications BYTE Dr. Dobb's Summary: Red unicycles to you, buddy! In article <707@sugar.UUCP> peter@sugar.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes: >> Crap. They care about solutions. IBM legitamized the whole crop of >> buisness oriented microcomputers, and made it fit on top of the >> desk instead of BE the desk, to boot. (no put intended) > >Talking about bovine excrement. CP/M had already achieved considerable >acceptance from the business community. In fact there was a fair amount >of opposition to the IBM-PC at first because it wasn't CP/M compatible. > >IBM legitimised nothing. As usual, they took over an existing market. >-- Peter da Silva `-_-' ...!hoptoad!academ!uhnix1!sugar!peter But but but... CP/M was just an operating system. It ran on all sorts or different hardware, 8080's, Z-80's, 8" drives, 5" drives, S-100 busses, STD bus ets. In other words, the software was pretty standardized (except for the Z-80 vs 8080 vs 8085 question), but the hardware was wildly divergent. IBM offered a one-stop solution. It may suck dead gerbils through a dirty garden hose, but it seems to suit most peoples needs. (them whats donts need blitters and copper lists that is ;-) Followups (if any) somewhere else. -- Richard J. Sexton INTERNET: richard@gryphon.CTS.COM UUCP: {hplabs!hp-sdd, sdcsvax, ihnp4, nosc}!crash!gryphon!richard "It's too dark to put the keys in my ignition..."