Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!jade!violet.berkeley.edu!mwm From: mwm@violet.berkeley.edu (Mike (My watch has windows) Meyer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Red's Dream... Message-ID: <5312@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Sat, 3-Oct-87 03:56:41 EDT Article-I.D.: jade.5312 Posted: Sat Oct 3 03:56:41 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 7-Oct-87 06:15:17 EDT Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: mwm@violet.berkeley.edu (Mike (My watch has windows) Meyer) Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica Lines: 28 Having finally seen Red's Dream, I thought I'd comment on what's gone on (don't I always?). Firstly, those of you who want to see it should watch for the 20th Tournee of Animation in your neighborhood art theatres. This includes both Red's Dream and Luxo Jr. - and some stuff that's *really* good! Red's Dream is of *much* higher quality than "The Dream ?x ?y"?. Leo has put together a good computer animation. Pixar has something that makes me think they use models in the film, and not computer generated images. I can see where Pixar is coming from. Leo's stuff is good enough to notice (better than some animations in movies in the last few years). However, it't not in the same league as what Pixar is doing. I'd be upset if I was doing what they do, and someone thought it was of the quality that "The Dream ?x ?y" was. Also, I'd like to point out that Pixar got the juggling pattern "right", whereas Leo has Red doing it "the hard way."