Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!dorothy.Berkeley.EDU!c9c-eh
From: c9c-eh@dorothy.Berkeley.EDU (Warner Young (WHY))
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: GemDraw GemWrite
Message-ID: <3906@zen.berkeley.edu>
Date: Tue, 22-Sep-87 21:35:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: zen.3906
Posted: Tue Sep 22 21:35:00 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 25-Sep-87 01:31:18 EDT
References: <2182@ihlpf.ATT.COM> <67@piring.cwi.nl>
Sender: news@zen.berkeley.edu
Reply-To: c9c-eh@dorothy.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Warner Young (WHY))
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 19
Keywords: GEM Write Draw version
Summary: Where? When?

In article <67@piring.cwi.nl> steven@cwi.nl (Steven Pemberton) writes:
> ... office/office automation trade fair) and guess what? I saw both
> Gemwrite and Gemdraw running on an ST, as well as Gem version 2.2, and
> The version of Gem was obviously a post-Apple version, because there
> were no rubber-boxes, or desk-top icons and that sort of thing.

>Steven Pemberton, CWI, Amsterdam; steven@cwi.nl

By GEM version 2.2, I assume you mean on the Atari PC?  As far as I know,
the version of GEM in the Megas and in all forthcoming versions of the ST
will not comform to Apple's idea of a safe competitor.  Also, do you know
what versions of GEM Write and GEM Draw you saw?  Are they in the beta-test
stage, or more advanced now?  Also, did you happen to see anything
that mentions if DRI will market them, or Atari, or someone else?


	-Warner Young
	 W  H   Y   ?
	 -because...