Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!ljdickey
From: ljdickey@water.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st,comp.sys.misc,comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Atari Transputers ? & A British ST/Amiga Rival ?
Message-ID: <1138@water.waterloo.edu>
Date: Wed, 30-Sep-87 16:27:31 EDT
Article-I.D.: water.1138
Posted: Wed Sep 30 16:27:31 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 2-Oct-87 00:37:22 EDT
References: <8709181728.AA13664@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <1623@gryphon.CTS.COM> <607@sbcs.UUCP>
Reply-To: ljdickey@water.waterloo.edu (Lee Dickey)
Distribution: world
Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 15
Xref: utgpu comp.sys.atari.st:5035 comp.sys.misc:800 comp.sys.amiga:8353

In article <607@sbcs.UUCP> root@sbcs.UUCP (Root) writes:
>> >      One article I have seen quotes the performance of the slower T414
>> >      processor (20 mhz) as 10 MIPS !
>
>	RISC mips, unfortunately. 

You seem to imply that RISC mips are not quite as good as some other kind
of MIPS.  Are RISC mips slower somehow?  Are more instructions needed to
produce the same results?   Explain, please.

-- 
 L. J. Dickey, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Waterloo. 
 ljdickey@watmath.UUCP		UUCP: ...!uunet!watmath!ljdickey
 ljdickey%water@waterloo.edu	ljdickey@watdcs.BITNET		
 ljdickey%water%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.ARPA