Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!hplabs!pyramid!uccba!finegan
From: finegan@uccba.UUCP (Mike Finegan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec
Subject: Re: ultrix 2.0 NFS/YP questions
Message-ID: <1235@uccba.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 19-Sep-87 11:54:07 EDT
Article-I.D.: uccba.1235
Posted: Sat Sep 19 11:54:07 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 20-Sep-87 15:48:09 EDT
References: <16562@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA>
Organization: Univ of Cincinnati, College of Business Admin.
Lines: 20
Keywords: filesystem changes and heterogeneous systems
Summary: re: ultrix 2.0 yp & nfs

In article <16562@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA>, mkhaw@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA (Mike Khaw) writes:
> Two questions regarding Ultrix 2.0:
> 
> 1) does ultrix 2.0 yp integrate with Sun 3.x yp?  We have a Sun yp
>    domain that predates a GPX that was just installed.  I ran /etc/ypsetup
>    and /usr/adm/bin/nfssetup to set the GPX up as an NFS client and a yp
>    client (in the same domain as the Suns).  The GPX says it can't find
>    any yp servers in the yp domain, but none of the suns has a problem.
>    We have one master and 2 slave yp servers.
>    ...
We are currently upgrading to 2.0, and plan to use nfs & yp with several
Suns we have. In the Documentation (release notes actually) there is a
reference to the problem you describe, and says something about the predating you mentioned as a problem. If we have problems, and solve the same problem, I'll
surely let you know ...
Also, we will be using 1.2 filesystems, but on tape, not on disc. Would that be
completely different? 
				Thanks,
					Mike Finegan
					...{hal,pyramid}!uccba!finegan