Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mtune!codas!killer!dunno
From: dunno@killer.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: turboc vs quickc
Message-ID: <1576@killer.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 19-Sep-87 17:42:39 EDT
Article-I.D.: killer.1576
Posted: Sat Sep 19 17:42:39 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 20-Sep-87 16:39:53 EDT
Organization: The Unix(R) Connection, Dallas, Texas
Lines: 12
Keywords: turboc vs quickc

I have been following the (for lack of a better word) debate over the merits 
of qc vs tc. I own msc 4.0 masm 4.0 and am waiting for the upgrade. I also own
turboc. I use tc for most of my work because of its quickness in replying to
my mistakes in coding and the fact that if you enable all of the error checking
capabilities it gives near lint feedback. I still use msc 4.0 for some applic-
ations partialy for the compabitily of add on  libraries. If you like tc fine 
use it , if you like msc fine use it; to complain and carry on to me seem to be
childish, THIS IS MY OWN OPINION. Each has its strengths and weakness's. Use 
whatever is appropriate. 

Thanks for the time 
Don O'Connell