Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!gauss.rutgers.edu!euler.rutgers.edu!raycomas
From: raycomas@euler.rutgers.edu (Ray Comas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,misc.headlines
Subject: Re: COMPUTER USER ARRESTED!
Message-ID: <107@euler.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 22-Sep-87 12:45:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: euler.107
Posted: Tue Sep 22 12:45:49 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 24-Sep-87 05:31:30 EDT
References: <170@westmark.UUCP> <352@auscso.UUCP> <6315@ut-ngp.UUCP> <2372@i.cc.purdue.edu>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 15
Summary: Please move the discussion elsewhere!
Xref: mnetor comp.sys.ibm.pc:8137 misc.headlines:1615

In article <2372@i.cc.purdue.edu>, aja@i.cc.purdue.edu (Mike Rowan) writes:
> In article <367@auscso.UUCP>, johnm@auscso.UUCP (John B. Meaders) writes:
> > If the citizens don't own guns, only the outlaws will!  I don't feel like
> > arguing with any bleeding hearts, but I cherish my right to own firearms.
[...]
> > that want to own weapons should be able to own them.  Because, if we are
>        ^^^^ keyword.  The citizen should be able to own firearms.
[etc.]

There have been several such postings recently, which prompts me to
ask the following question:
Why are people discussing gun control in comp.sys.ibm.pc?  This is not
the place for this debate.  I'm sure that there are other news groups
were this discussion is apropos, please move it there.  (I hope this
doesn't sound like nit-picking ...) Thank you.