Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!gatech!bloom-beacon!think!ames!ptsfa!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!bsu-cs!dhesi
From: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: A different View of the value of OS/2 - it's better than Unix
Message-ID: <1180@bsu-cs.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 27-Sep-87 11:52:21 EDT
Article-I.D.: bsu-cs.1180
Posted: Sun Sep 27 11:52:21 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 27-Sep-87 23:42:56 EDT
References: <494@parcvax.Xerox.COM> <961@looking.UUCP> <498@parcvax.Xerox.COM> <230@hobbes.UUCP> <1611@killer.UUCP>
Reply-To: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi)
Organization: CS Dept, Ball St U, Muncie, Indiana
Lines: 7
Summary: Which DOS?

In article <1611@killer.UUCP> richardh@killer.UUCP (Richard Hargrove) writes:
>Are you implying that what is true for DOS will also be true for OS/2?  

MS-DOS, CP/M, OS/2, UNIX, AmigaDOS, TRSDOS, are all DOSes.  If
something is true of every DOS it's true of OS/2.
-- 
Rahul Dhesi         UUCP:  <backbones>!{iuvax,pur-ee,uunet}!bsu-cs!dhesi