Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!zen!cory.Berkeley.EDU!iverson
From: iverson@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Tim Iverson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Dhrystone for 386 Unix
Message-ID: <4275@zen.berkeley.edu>
Date: Mon, 12-Oct-87 02:03:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: zen.4275
Posted: Mon Oct 12 02:03:30 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 13-Oct-87 02:29:45 EDT
References: <1435@van-bc.UUCP>
Sender: news@zen.berkeley.edu
Reply-To: iverson@cory.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Tim Iverson)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 23
Keywords: dhystone 80386
Xref: mnetor comp.unix.xenix:941 comp.sys.ibm.pc:8964

In article <1435@van-bc.UUCP> sl@van-bc.UUCP (Stuart Lynne) writes:
>	Dhrystone 1.1 registers		3571
>	Dhrystone 1.1 noregisters	3333
>
>	Bell Technologies MPE/386 
>	(a.k.a. Intel Mother board)
>	Bell Technologies System V for the 80386

This is still pretty slow.  This is what I get for our PC Designs 386
(386 @ 16Mhz w/ 64k static RAM cache, using MSC 4.0: cl -AS -W2 -Ox,
small model, 286 code, optimize w/ no stack checking & relaxed aliasing):

	Dhrystone (1.1) registers	4668
	Dhrystone (1.1) noregisters	4621

Let's all post benchmarks for these 386 boxes (no Norton SI foolishness,
please!).  I don't volunteer to collect and tabulate them, but I would
love to see how fast the machines really are.


- Tim Iverson
  iverson@cory.Berkeley.EDU
  ucbvax!comhght.
UUCP