Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!decvax!dartvax!isle
From: isle@dartvax.UUCP (Ken Hancock)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: FullWrite Professional?
Message-ID: <7131@dartvax.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 19-Sep-87 16:48:50 EDT
Article-I.D.: dartvax.7131
Posted: Sat Sep 19 16:48:50 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 20-Sep-87 22:46:56 EDT
References: <2238@mulga.oz> <4469@oberon.USC.EDU>
Reply-To: isle@dartvax.UUCP (Ken Hancock)
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
Lines: 31
Keywords: FullWrite Professional, Vaporware?

In article <4469@oberon.USC.EDU> humphrey@skat.usc.edu (Steve Humphrey) writes:
>
>I am somewhat worried that most packages have far too many features.
>I.E.  FullWrite has a MacDraw like capability for creating pictures.
>With multifinder coming out, shouldn't software be DEcentralizing,
>that is, performing a single function.  I know a product like MS Works
>was needed before multifinder, but now wouldn't software be better if
>we could choose only the modules (programs) that we will be actually
>using.  
>
>Comments?

Yup.  I have a comment, or rather a question.

Do you have a mac with at least 2 megs memory?

Yes?  Good, you'll be able to make good use of multifinder and use whatever
applications you want.

No?  Too bad.  Thank goodness some programs have additional tools bundled
within them.

Ken



-- 
Ken Hancock  //           UUCP: isle@dartvax                    //  Join the
____________//          BITNET: isle@u2.dartmouth.edu          //   SMILE :)
DISCLAIMER://_________________________________________________//   Revolution!
         If people weren't so sue-happy, I wouldn't need one!//_______________