Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!clyde!watmath!watdragon!violet!gjditchfield From: gjditchfield@violet.waterloo.edu (Glen Ditchfield) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Tech Note #0 Message-ID: <3552@watdragon.waterloo.edu> Date: Sat, 26-Sep-87 14:53:06 EDT Article-I.D.: watdrago.3552 Posted: Sat Sep 26 14:53:06 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 27-Sep-87 11:53:13 EDT References: <2575@bnrmtv.UUCP> Sender: daemon@watdragon.waterloo.edu Reply-To: gjditchfield@violet.waterloo.edu (Glen Ditchfield) Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 39 Keywords: Wrong Binhex? In article <2575@bnrmtv.UUCP> takahash@bnrmtv.UUCP (Alan Takahashi) writes: >I've been having a problem with trying to Binhex most of the Mac Tech >Notes that have been posted in comp.binaries.mac. A typical example >is the Technical Note #0 recently posted. When I run the file through >binhex, I get a file with the following attributes: > > File : "Mactech #0" > Type : "0: A" > Creator: "bout" The problem is that you didn't delete all the text above the "(This file..." line. Normally you don't have to, but the Tech Notes all have lines in them that look like [Macintosh Technical Notes - #0: About Macintosh Technical Notes] I think that when Binhex[4,5] sees the colon, it starts treating the following text as encoded data. Don't feel bad; this problem bites me once in each tech note batch, and I know better! Mr. Moderator: could you arrange to have these lines removed from future postings? While I'm making whining noises... ERVision and Design each came through as segments of a giant Binhex file. UnBinhexing those files produced giant PackIt files, which included the documentation. I would prefer that large programs be distributed as one Binhexed PackIt file of the documentation, and one Binhexed PackIt file of the program and sample documents, segmented as necessary. Then I could download the documentation, read it, and decide whether I want to download the program. Downloading Design took hours. If I ever submit a large program, should I arrange things this way, or does the moderator repack things as he pleases? (I could use xbin, unpit, and unxbin on the Vax, and occasionally I do. But I would rather burn CPU time on my computer than the University's.) -- Glen Ditchfield {watmath,utzoo,ihnp4}!watrose!gjditchfield Dept of Computer Science, U of Waterloo (519) 885-1211 x6658 Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Office: MC 2006 If you grab the bull by the horns, you at least confuse him -- R.A.Heinlein