Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!endor!singer
From: singer@endor.harvard.edu (Andrew Singer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: LSC projects v libraries
Message-ID: <2893@husc6.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 28-Sep-87 13:33:13 EDT
Article-I.D.: husc6.2893
Posted: Mon Sep 28 13:33:13 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 29-Sep-87 06:00:27 EDT
References: <3415@pucc.Princeton.EDU>
Sender: news@husc6.UUCP
Reply-To: singer@endor.UUCP (Andrew Singer)
Organization: THINK Technologies, Inc., Bedford, MA
Lines: 25

In article <3415@pucc.Princeton.EDU> MJSCHMEL@pucc.Princeton.EDU writes:
>I've noticed that making a library out of MacTraps and other
>project files is a good way to save space on my diskettes when
>using LSC. Is there any disadvantage to this? What is the difference
>between the two formats (other than you can't open a library as a
>project)?

The disadvantage is that projects are smart-linked at the level of their
components, and libraries are not. If you use a library, you're likely to end
up with a lot of dead code in your application.

		--Rich

**The opinions stated herein are my own opinions and do not necessarily
represent the policies or opinions of my employer (THINK Technologies, Inc).

Richard M. Siegel
Customer Support Representative
THINK Technologies, Inc.

Uucp: {decvax, ucbvax, sun}!harvard!endor!singer
Internet/Arpanet: singer@harvard.harvard.edu

No one writes programs that work right the first time. If they did,
I'd be out of a job.