Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!mit-eddie!bloom-beacon!oberon!skat.usc.edu!humphrey From: humphrey@skat.usc.edu (Steve Humphrey) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: A Design Philosophy Message-ID: <4665@oberon.USC.EDU> Date: Sat, 10-Oct-87 01:59:37 EDT Article-I.D.: oberon.4665 Posted: Sat Oct 10 01:59:37 1987 Date-Received: Mon, 12-Oct-87 04:29:13 EDT Sender: nobody@oberon.USC.EDU Reply-To: humphrey@skat.usc.edu (Steve Humphrey) Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA Lines: 28 In article <399@sdics.ucsd.EDU> norman@sdics.UUCP (Donald A. Norman) writes: >If a design flaw leads to errors, it isn't the user who should be >blamed for making the error. Telling the user about the danger is not >sufficient. The proper design avoids the possibily of the error in >the first place. Users are human, and humans err. (It is a >fundamental part of our operation, in part, I believe because many of >the information processing features that make us reliable, creative, >and imaginiative have as side effects error. (This is an informed, >professional opinion, on which I have written much.) Here Here! (There? There?) When the Macintosh was introduced in Feb (?) 1984, Apple put one up on stage and, with a specially hacked up macintalk file, had it introduce itself with an amplifier and a microphone. The text, which I remember almost verbatim and which came (I believe) from the first glossy pamphlet produced, said that Apple engineers "worked night and day, and a few legal holidays, teaching tiny silicon chips about people: how they make mistakes and change their minds. ." Now just when, pray tell, did we teach the Mac ( or for that matter, any other hardware, software, peripheralware, or etcware) that it no longer had to compensate for the MISTAKES OF PEOPLE. -- Steve Humphrey USPS: P.O. Box 1285 humphrey@skat.usc.edu (NOT castor.usc.edu anymore!) Dixon, CA 95620 "There is beauty all around, when there's love at home."