Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!eurifb!wietse From: wietse@eurifb.UUCP (Wietse Venema) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix Subject: Was: Microport Unix V/AT and 9600 baud Message-ID: <211@eurifb.UUCP> Date: Fri, 25-Sep-87 17:56:36 EDT Article-I.D.: eurifb.211 Posted: Fri Sep 25 17:56:36 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 27-Sep-87 09:33:31 EDT References: <207@eurifb.UUCP> <105@suprt.UUCP> Organization: EUR/Bedrijfskunde,PObox 1738,Rotterdam,Neth. Lines: 35 Keywords: Microport 2.2 unreported bug Summary: coming up In article <105@suprt.UUCP>, jmsully@suprt.UUCP (John M. Sully UUCP: ...!{sun | ucbvax | ihnp4}!amdcad!uport!techs) writes: > In article <207@eurifb.UUCP>, wietse@eurifb.UUCP (Wietse Venema) writes: > > [problem with large-buffer floppy writes/reads in a program that > > spreads the input/output of tar across several floppies] > > As of September 22, 1987 this bug had not been reported to us. We have a > program which we use in-house which writes to the floppy in ~60K chunks > and we do not have a problem with this. > > [remarks about raw devices and tar blocking factors] (the original article appeared in comp.unix.wizards but this seems like a more appropriate newsgroup) In the following examples the kernel starts to print error messages when buffers of 10-20 kb are read/written from/to the raw 360kb floppy device: tar cvf - $* | while dd ibs=512 count=720 obs=20k of=/dev/rdsk/fd148 do (echo "\7next flop: \c"; read answer) >/dev/tty /dev/tty