Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!amdcad!ames!sdcsvax!ucbvax!ZERMATT.LCS.MIT.EDU!RWS From: RWS@ZERMATT.LCS.MIT.EDU (Robert Scheifler) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: re: 9x15 font Message-ID: <870930074432.2.RWS@KILLINGTON.LCS.MIT.EDU> Date: Wed, 30-Sep-87 07:44:00 EDT Article-I.D.: KILLINGT.870930074432.2.RWS Posted: Wed Sep 30 07:44:00 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 4-Oct-87 21:09:32 EDT References: <956@jumbo.dec.com> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 50 Date: 29 Sep 87 22:56:26 GMT From: jumbo!jg@decwrl.dec.com (Jim Gettys) This bug report/fix is courtesy of Ram Rao, Digital UEG... - Jim VERSION: X11 release 1 SYNOPSIS: The 9x15 font supplied does not work with a terminal emulator DESCRIPTION: The comments in the file fonts/bdf/9x15.bdf indicate that the font is intended for use with a terminal emulator. However, since the width of every character is specified as 10 pixels, whereas the glyph is 9 pixels wide. This causes problems to the terminal emulator. REPEAT-BY: xterm -fn 9x15 will exhibit this problem [From me to Ram:] > I'll agree that a 9x15 font ought to have a width of 9, but I couldn't > find a "problem" in running xterm with the font as it is defined. Since > xterm *should* work with fonts of this sort (after all, that's why we > changed the semantics of ImageText), could you please be more specific > about what the "problem" exhibited is, and how to demonstrate it? From: ram@decvax.dec.com You are right. The only "problem" is the unsightlyness of the text. I complained because my GPX X server was implementing the old image text semantics and hence leaving glitches in the xterm window. I implemented the new image text semantics today and the problem went away. (Due to some oversight, I did not learn about the change in image text semantics till yesterday.) However, I still suggest the 9x15 font should have a width of 9. It looks much nicer that way. FIX: In the file fonts/bdf/9x15.bdf replace ALL occurences of the line DWIDTH 10 0 by the line DWIDTH 9 0 The fix is a reasonable one, in any case.