Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!rochester!cornell!batcomputer!pyramid!epimass!jbuck From: jbuck@epimass.UUCP Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: Mark Ethan Smith: For real? Message-ID: <1535@epimass.EPI.COM> Date: Wed, 30-Sep-87 20:43:09 EDT Article-I.D.: epimass.1535 Posted: Wed Sep 30 20:43:09 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 3-Oct-87 05:03:30 EDT References: <378d6016.b8ab@apollo.uucp> <5261@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <2050@kitty.UUCP> Reply-To: jbuck@epimass.EPI.COM (Joe Buck) Followup-To: alt.flame Organization: Entropic Processing, Inc., Cupertino, CA Lines: 46 Summary: The personal life of MES (or other users) is none of your business In article <2050@kitty.UUCP> larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman) writes: > No Usenet site should have anonymous users. Usenet is not (or >SHOULD not) be conducted as a juvenile BBS. MES is not an anonymous user. Mark Ethan Smith is, in fact, MES's legal name. There is no anonymity and no deception in his postings, and they are very serious, not whimsical. He has an unusual point of view (I use "he", though MES is a woman, because that is his preference -- if you want to get into a battle about the appropriateness of pronouns please check out soc.women and not this group) which he argues vigorously, just like many well-known posters. He has never made the top 25 or even come close; most of the volume has come from the MES-haters. > I view the presence of anonymous and deceptive posters as a cancer >which seriously undermines the quality and integrity of Usenet. I call upon >any system administrator having "Smith" accounts to: > >1. Post to the Net any identifying information in their possession > about "Smith". Only after Larry Lippman's administrator posts all personal information in his or her possession about Larry Lippman. MES has posted quite a lot of accurate information about his unusual life and experiences. The very first message he ever posted to the net explained, in detail, who he was and why he had his name legally changed, along with a lot of personal history. Everything since then has been consistent with that. I haven't seen Larry do the same. Yes, MES's attack against Berkeley news administrators was unjustified. But he has been booted from two systems in the past and treated unfairly at others. A little paranoia is not surprising given the history. And given that he is charged money for use of violet.berkeley.edu and his only use of the system is for news and mail, it seems reasonable for him to expect that they will be maintained. I do not agree with many things MES says, but I STRONGLY defend his right to say it. This group is not for discussion of personalities, and no action is called for on the part of news administrators. Followups to alt.flame. -- - Joe Buck {uunet,ucbvax,sun,decwrl,}!epimass.epi.com!jbuck Old internet mailers: jbuck%epimass.epi.com@uunet.uu.net