Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!amdcad!ames!xanth!kyle
From: kyle@xanth.UUCP (Kyle Jones)
Newsgroups: news.sysadmin,news.groups
Subject: Re: new newsgroups?
Message-ID: <2687@xanth.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 8-Oct-87 04:51:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: xanth.2687
Posted: Thu Oct  8 04:51:37 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 11-Oct-87 00:55:22 EDT
References: <30206@sun.uucp>
Lines: 17
Xref: mnetor news.sysadmin:390 news.groups:1663

In article <30206@sun.uucp>, shannon%datsun@Sun.COM (Bill Shannon) writes:
> Recently I've been getting lots of articles in newsgroups that
> don't exist locally.  Did I perhaps miss a bunch of newgroup
> messages?   Here's just a small sample:
> 
> comp.ai.neural-nets           3
> comp.editors                 73
> comp.edu.composition         24
> ...
> Are these legitimate groups or not?

Here we go again.  I ask again: Can these groups be excised from the
"official" USENET tree?  Putting the inet groups under comp, sci, rec
etc. has thoroughly confused users and programs alike.  Why aren't the
"inet" groups is distributed in the same manner as the alt groups?

kyle jones  <kyle@odu.edu>  old dominion university, norfolk, va  usa