Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!necntc!ames!aurora!labrea!decwrl!pyramid!prls!philabs!ttidca!regard
From: regard@ttidca.TTI.COM (Adrienne Regard)
Newsgroups: soc.women,news.sysadmin,misc.legal
Subject: Re: Larry Lippman vs. Mark Ethan Smith
Message-ID: <1325@ttidca.TTI.COM>
Date: Wed, 7-Oct-87 11:23:19 EDT
Article-I.D.: ttidca.1325
Posted: Wed Oct  7 11:23:19 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 11-Oct-87 08:45:07 EDT
References: <1939@midas.TEK.COM> <1514@dasys1.UUCP> <7070@eddie.MIT.EDU> <7078@eddie.MIT.EDU> <2074@kitty.UUCP> <995@maynard.BSW.COM>
Reply-To: regard@ttidcb.UUCP (Adrienne Regard)
Organization: Citicorp/TTI, Santa Monica
Lines: 25
Xref: mnetor soc.women:7644 news.sysadmin:393 misc.legal:3038

In article <995@maynard.BSW.COM> campbell@maynard.UUCP (Larry Campbell) writes:

> (lots of stuff about denying access, accusations, counter-accusations
> and who hasn't yet said what to whom in denial or affirmation).

Sometimes you people amaze me.  (Not just you, Larry, since others have
presented your point before).

This is a public BB.  Tracing postings from a vast network to the fingers
of one user is not possible.

People can say things in public AND THEN CHOOSE TO SAY THINGS IN PRIVATE.
Nobody on the net owes anybody else ANYTHING, let alone apologies or
explanations.   It may be CIVIL to offer either or both, but it certainly
isn't mandatory.

If it were, the next month would be taken up with the retractions, as the
last month has been taken up with flaming crap.

Do we need to clutter up the bandwidth with cheers from the peanut gallery?
-- 

"See - the thing is - I'm an absolutist.  I mean, kind of. . .in a way. . ."
								  -(Denise)
Adrienne Regard  {philabs,trwrb,psivax}!ttidca!ttidcb!regard