Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!hoptoad!amdcad!decwrl!labrea!jade!ucbvax!ernie.Berkeley.EDU!jwl
From: jwl@ernie.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Gun licensing proposal (was Re: Re:
Message-ID: <21299@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Fri, 16-Oct-87 22:29:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.21299
Posted: Fri Oct 16 22:29:37 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 18-Oct-87 03:46:38 EDT
References: <21293@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <53300005@silver>
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: jwl@ernie.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (James Wilbur Lewis)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 19

In article <53300005@silver> creps@silver.bacs.indiana.edu writes:
->/* Written  9:15 pm  Oct 15, 1987 by jwl@ernie.Berkeley.EDU in silver:alt.flame */
->
->used for training cops...as you walk through a building simulating a
->dark alley or other dangerous situation, "good guy" and "bad guy"
->targets pop up...if you shoot an innocent bystander, you fail.
-
- So, I guess the easiest way to pass the test is not shoot ANY of the targets.
-Or do you also fail for not shooting a "bad guy?" 

I didn't say that shooting a "good guy" was the ONLY way you could fail.

I don't know how the police tests are scored.  A civilian version of
the test could be scored pretty much the same way;  I imagine you would
be required to hit a certain percentage of the "bad guys" without taking
out any bystanders.

-- Jim Lewis
   U.C. Berkeley