Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!hoptoad!ihnp4!chinet!rhonda
From: rhonda@chinet.UUCP
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Fighting off the weemba worshipers
Message-ID: <1780@chinet.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 25-Oct-87 20:36:26 EST
Article-I.D.: chinet.1780
Posted: Sun Oct 25 20:36:26 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 27-Oct-87 06:23:09 EST
References: <1747@chinet.UUCP> <90@bacchus.DEC.COM>
Reply-To: rhonda@chinet.UUCP (Rhonda Scribner)
Organization: Chinet - Public Access Unix
Lines: 34

Wow, in one article this guy calling himself Elder Weem has come out to
rattle on about my "premire" article in this affair (actually anyone who's
been reading these articles knows that my last article was post-mire :-) )
In his tantrum, he accuses me of hypocrasy (his spelling) in (get this!)
defending Tim Maroney (obviously he posts in an alternate universe).  Not
only does he fail to spell my name right (I thought correctly spelling the
name of the person you're flaming was rule #1 of net etiquette), he fails
to spell a number of words even close to right, including the
aforementioned "premire,"  "Brahams," "whitty," and last but not least,
"Aycuk!"  I mean, the battle cry of the "Brahams" gang, and this guy
can't even get that right!  Then, after repeatedly saying how this
last article of mine was my first article ever (while at the same time
saying that I've been posting "all over the net") and how I wasn't there
for the originals, he continues to make mistakes so fast I lost count.
Unbeknownst to me, I flamed at Eric Fair, according to Elder Weem.  Sorry
to disappoint, but I've never had any words with Eric Fair (though he did
respond to an article of mine once).  No, when you talk about attacking
Eric Fair and posting and flaiming all over th net, I think you're refering
to Mark Ethan Smith.  But then, to you I'm sure all us "overbearing women"
(Weem's words) look alike, right?  Sheesh!

The only reason I'm bothering to respond to such an obvious plethora
of misinformation is to make sure Gene welcomes him properly into the
"Brahams" Gang Fan Club.  Here is a paragon of BG style and substance for
you to marvel at, Gene.  I'll bet you and Matthew don't even get this
good! :-)  Though I'll bet you wish you could.  Remember, this is a guy
who looks up to and idolizes you and Matthew, saying "yes, Matthew was
an S.O.B. but he was OUR S.O.B."  Perhaps you'll reflect on this a bit.
Instead of cooking up another "Rhonda is mean and nasty to us" article.
Actually in recent days I've found nothing more amusing than the flurry
of articles berating me for talking negatively about the poor "defenseless"
Brahms Gang as the authors scold OTHER people for their crybaby "whining."
Ayuck ayuck ayuck, anyone?
								--Rhonda