Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!hoptoad!amdcad!amdahl!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!rutgers!rochester!udel!burdvax!sdcrdcf!ism780c!mikep From: mikep@ism780c.UUCP Newsgroups: talk.bizarre,alt.flame Subject: Re: I know where you live Message-ID: <7650@ism780c.UUCP> Date: Tue, 27-Oct-87 03:56:36 EST Article-I.D.: ism780c.7650 Posted: Tue Oct 27 03:56:36 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 29-Oct-87 06:07:44 EST References: <1135@puff.wisc.edu> Reply-To: mikep@ism780c.UUCP (Michael A. Petonic) Organization: Inter{ Lines: 133 Keywords: finger (there it is, that death program again) Xref: hoptoad talk.bizarre:8044 alt.flame:375 Summary: ... and he's comming to get you! Heh heh heh, that ole capital F key is at it again. I almost had an orgasm when I read this note. Chortle Chortle ... In article <1135@puff.wisc.edu> mading@puff.wisc.edu (Eric Mading) writes: >A message to all those who flame me or make fun of my views: I never did before, but make this a first. You seem like such a likely target for flames, I couldn't resist. I know I should be typesetting my notes for Calc, but this is far more interesting... BTW: Were you born with the letters ``F-L-A-M-E--M-E'' stamped on your forehead? >I will never abandon my views. Sure, my views will change, perhaps radically, >but I will never stop posting what I think. Those who disagree have the >freedomto post their views. I might not make it in the real world, and [Hmmm, so far this flaming is really easy. You just let the Bonehead do all the talking...] >I might not getany responses to my article requesting female companionship >(I did get one reply, but after reading some of my articles, she told me >we have nothing in common. I won't reveal her name, but she does post in >this newsgroup.), but I am willing to take these risks. Do we see some chivalry? Nah, just stupidity and blind loyalty to a (possible scandal?) net.goddess who answers desperate pleas for help. >It may cost me job offers, but I am willing to pay that price to say >what's on my mind. Not a very smart undergrad, are you??? If you didn't go to college to make yourself more attractive to potential employers, then did you go to college for the social life? If you have to post on the net for a date, I don't think that's the answer. Must be all that acadamia. Yeah, that's the ticket. Profs give you a hard-on. >Too many people out there in the college world have a stereotype of Computer >Science majors as "nerds". Women who I meet in bars, who find out I am a CS >major, lose intrest in me. I am an attractive man (some women would say I am >cute, or even a hunk), but because I am a Comp. Sci. major, no good-looking >woman will go out with me. That's why I posted an article asking for a girl- >friend. I know that all the women out there in net.land do not have these >sterotypes of male CS majors and that the female readers are also well educated >and intelligent. This whole paragraph is a pathetic excuse on why you can't get a date. Seriously, I've heard excuses from dick size, Freudian experiences, Zits, Bad Breath, Overweight, bald, etc. on why some bloke couldn't get a date and your reason has to be the stupidest one I've ever heard. What, the next thing I'll hear is ``I can't get a date, my body is too good, muscle definition too sharp, I make too much money, I've got too good a sense of humor, I'm too sensual and compassionate, and I'm too good for girls. Thats how come I can't get a date.'' Though, from your previous postings, I'd have to say that you probably contribute to the idea that all CS majors are nerds. Whatever you do, don't change your major to EE and frequent any bars that I do. If you do, don't tell them what your major is. >I am willing to date any woman out there, regardless of breastsize, height, >hair color, looks, political views, opinions, religion, race, or >creed. I am even willing to date a divorced woman with children, or even a >pro-choicer. What a man. Willing to scrape the bottom of the barrel, go through the dreg to get a date. He'd even go so far as to date a [insert sarcastic voice] divorced woman or even a pro choicer. No, Eric, I don't think you're the limiting factor in this lack of a date equation, I think the girls are. >Well, those who attack me and not my views--I can easily find out where you >live. Our system has a finger command. I will get your name and I can call >directory assistance in your area to get your address and phone number. What the hell is this supposed to mean? Uh oh, I just shit my drawers. I'm afraid that you probably won't find me in any finger command as I'm not listed with SRI-NIC , but just in case you want to harrass my answering machine: Michael A. Petonic 11675 Darlington Ave, #103 Brentwood (West L.A.), CA 90049 (213) 820-0041 > I don't usually unsubscribe to a newsgroup, but the few exceptions have >been rec.nude, soc.motss, and soc.women. ^^^^^^^^ I wonder why? Perhaps because they didn't upload digitized pictures of themselves in the buff? Perhaps that's the same reason that you initially subscribed to soc.motss for. >I also unsubscribed to soc.singles (I regret it now) >because the volume was too great for me. If anyone out there can tell me how >to resubcribe to a newsgroup, reply to this article. A sincere plea for help? Ok, it's the 'g' command when you're using "rn." I know this counteracts your gambit to have girls take pity on you and perhaps go out with you, but that's why I did it. >And in the future, don't >post flames, post only intelligent attacks on my articles, and don't grab >information from other articles of mine. If you want to flame me, that is your >First Admendment right, please mail me your flames. Hmmm, is this an order? Read on, dear reader, for our beloved victim cites CONSTITUTIONAL LAW for us to be reassured that we can post our views. [Sideline on Bork: After reading Eric's post on the net, Bork is heard to comment, "I didn't see where the Framers mentioned anything about UseNet."] >It is your First Amendment >right to post your views, no matter how stupid they may be, but it is my First >Amendment right to post my views, and to ask for girlfriends on the net. Rather ambitions in this day and age isn't it? Not asking for dates, but honest to goodness ``Girlfriends!'' Whoa, why didn't you just say "Hey, let's get married so I can sexually abuse you every night instead of whanking on my poor ole pecker"? > >Eric Mading > >BRING PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL TO MILWAUKEE FULL TIME. Michael A. Petonic KEEP THE ERIC MADING POSTS COMMING. IT'S JUST STARTING TO GET FUN!