Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!utcsri!utegc!utai!ubc-vision!ubc-cs!ubc-anchor!acton From: acton@ubc-anchor.UUCP Newsgroups: can.politics Subject: Re: N.B. Elections Message-ID: <1665@ubc-cs.UUCP> Date: Wed, 14-Oct-87 21:41:23 EDT Article-I.D.: ubc-cs.1665 Posted: Wed Oct 14 21:41:23 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 16-Oct-87 05:40:31 EDT References: <1168@water.waterloo.edu> Sender: nobody@ubc-cs.UUCP Reply-To: acton@ubc-csgrad.UUCP (Donald Acton) Distribution: can Organization: UBC Department of Computer Science, Vancouver, B.C., Canada Lines: 25 In article <1168@water.waterloo.edu> jmlang@water.waterloo.edu (Jerome M Lang) writes: }Well New Brunswick has done it again. It looks like there is NO OPPOSITION }at the provincial legislature }My question is, how does a democratically elected government does its }work properly without an opposition? To me this demonstrates one of the major problems of the party system in Canada and that is if you don't follow the party line your life, in the political sense, becomes miserable. It is my opinion that individual MPs, MLAs etc. should be able to speak out against the party line without fear of being banished to the political boondocks for the next millennium. (Witness the recent fall from grace of the NDP's Ian Waddell and several Liberals for their stand on the Meech Lake accord.) When one joins a political party they do so because they agree with the fundamental philosophy of the that party. It is very hard to believe that an individual (not a sheep) could agree with 100% of a party's policies. Likewise in an election sweep like this it is hard to believe 100% of the Liberal policies are preferred over those of the Conservatives and NDP by the people. Instead I am inclined to believe that the electorate preferred more of the Liberal party's policies. It therefore becomes the responsibility of the elected Liberal's who don't agree with specific policies to express their dissenting opinions and in effect act as the opposition. It is too bad that the present party system so strongly discourages such action. Donald Acton