Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!jbs
From: jbs@eddie.MIT.EDU (Jeff Siegal)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: MNP modems
Message-ID: <7203@eddie.MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 19-Oct-87 17:01:21 EDT
Article-I.D.: eddie.7203
Posted: Mon Oct 19 17:01:21 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Oct-87 21:17:51 EDT
References: <3013@husc6.UUCP> <377@cogent.UUCP>
Reply-To: jbs@eddie.MIT.EDU (Jeff Siegal)
Organization: MIT, EE/CS Computer Facilities, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 10
Keywords: MNP

In article <377@cogent.UUCP> mark@cogent.UUCP (PUT YOUR NAME HERE) writes:
>[...]
>MNP as a protocol has failed to meet our needs consistently.  Due to several
>aspects of UN*X that MNP design neglects and/or conflicts with, we have never
>gotten an MNP modem to work on our UN*X box.  [...]

Please me a bit more specific.  I haven't looked closely at MNP, but I
am interested in the observations of someone who has.

Jeff Siegal