Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!think!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!ccd700.UUCP!ron
From: ron@ccd700.UUCP (ron)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: "no main list"
Message-ID: <712@ccd700.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 11-Oct-87 22:37:27 EDT
Article-I.D.: ccd700.712
Posted: Sun Oct 11 22:37:27 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 17-Oct-87 16:34:14 EDT
References: <12338658193.15.AWALKER@RED.RUTGERS.EDU> <8709302323.AA20831@buita.bu.edu>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: Ford CCD, Dearborn Michigan
Lines: 21
Approved: telecom@xx.lcs.mit.edu
Summary: unlisted vs. "no main list"


In article <8709302323.AA20831@buita.bu.edu>, jsol@BU-IT.BU.EDU.UUCP writes:
>>    If the number doesn't appear in the directory, what's the difference between
>>    that and having it "unlisted"?
> Easy, you can get the number from your local Directory Assistance operator.

	some of these "bell" jerks think that the "no main list" 
function is what we want when we mean "UNLISTED".  for a fact I
have obtained these numbers by stating the fact of a serious 
situation.  This is not to say EMERGENCY!  some of the DAMM FOOL
 operators will put through a call just because some ass..... will
says it's important!.

	my sugestion is that ALL calls should be traced and the origin
be available to the CALLEE at NO CHARGE!   that will stop a lot of
crap going on today with jerks and the dammed computer FONE phreaks.

ronald r. tribble
...mibte!ccd700!ron

I love FIRE... flame me on this opinion all you want !!!!!!!!!!!